|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
| Address1 | 317 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., NE, SUITE 300C |
Address2 |
|
| City | WASHINGTON |
State | DC |
Zip Code | 20002 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
|
5. Senate ID# 293836-12
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 373580000
|
||||||||
| TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2014 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
| 10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date |
|
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
| INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
| INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
|
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
|||||||||
| Signature | Digitally Signed By: DERRICK B. OWENS |
Date | 4/21/2014 12:29:26 PM |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code TEC
16. Specific lobbying issues
Universal Service and Intercarrier Compensation Reform -- WTA continued sharing information with policymakers about how the Federal Communications Commission's 2011 USF/ICC Transformation Order is affecting rural local exchange carriers (RLECs) and their abilities to use universal service funds to invest in advanced networks to provide better broadband and extending it further into their service territories. WTA has also advocated for policymakers to begin to address USF Contribution Reform -- the mechanism by which consumers contribute to the Universal Service Fund. WTA also focused its attention on a provision within the 2011 Transformation Order which requires the FCC to conduct a survey of urban telephone rates as a means of setting the "floor" for such rates in rural areas.
The association continued focusing its efforts on promoting the Data Only Broadband Plan which would help increase broadband take-rates in rural communities. The Plan also meets the requirements in the Communications Act which calls for reasonably comparable rates and services between urban and rural communities.
Evolution of the Public Switch Network (PSTN) to Internet Protocol (IP) -- WTA continued sharing with policymakers stories and anecdotes about how RLECs continue to incorporate more IP technology into their networks as a way to maximize limited resources and to provide additional services to their customers.
E-Rate Modernization -- WTA supports modernizing the E-Rate program and has offered many key suggestions to reforming the program. In particular, WTA continued advocating against using E-Rate funds to build new networks when existing infrastructure can be leveraged to expand and meet the broadband needs of schools and libraries.
Communications Act Update -- WTA commented on the House Energy and Commerce's Communications and Technology's Subcommittee's White Papers regarding updating the Communications Act of 1934 (as amended). WTA shared its comments and thoughts with the Members of that Subcommittee and others interested in communications matters.
Call Completion -- WTA lobbied in support of S. 2125, Public Safety and Economic Security Communications Act of 2104. The legislation would require all voice calls to be terminated regardless of whether they were destined for urban or rural areas. Specifically, it requires an intermediate provider that offers the capability to transmit certain voice communications and signaling information from one destination to another, and that charges a rate to any other entity (including an affiliated entity) for the transmission, to: (1) register with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and (2) comply with service quality standards to be established by the FCC.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Derrick |
Owens |
|
|
|
Eric |
Keber |
|
|
|
Noah |
Cherry |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code AGR
16. Specific lobbying issues
H.R. 2642, Agriculture Act of 2014 -- WTA lobbied in support of the Farm Bill, specifically the provisions that dealt with the Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service Program which provides lending opportunities for small rural local exchange carriers (RLECs) enabling them to invest in telecommunications infrastructure in rural communities.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Derrick |
Owens |
|
|
|
Eric |
Keber |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code INT
16. Specific lobbying issues
S. 1353 (Cybersecurity Act of 2013) and H.R. 624 (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) -- WTA continued advocating for key liability protections that should be in place for small telecommunications carriers in an effort to enable information sharing between private industry and government agencies. The association continued advocating the National Institutes of Standards & Technology's (NIST's) Cybersecurity Framework should remain voluntary and non-prescriptive, that incentives encouraging adoption should be geared toward helping to defray the costs of implementing the plan.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Natl Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Derrick |
Owens |
|
|
|
Noah |
Cherry |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code COM
16. Specific lobbying issues
H.R. 3719, Video Choice Act of 2013; H.R. 3720, Next Generation Television Marketplace Act; Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act Reauthorization -- WTA continued its advocacy supporting these pieces of legislation which would provide some relief for rural local exchange carriers (RLECs) that are providing video services to their customers. Specifically, WTA advocacy focused on RLECs being able to gain better access to content; obtaining better pricing arrangements regarding transmission consent agreements; and eliminating forced tying arrangements regarding programming. WTA also advocated for the adoption of rules that prohibit joint negotiations by broadcast stations with different owners.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Derrick |
Owens |
|
|
|
Noah |
Cherry |
|
|
|
Eric |
Keber |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
| Address | |
||||||
| City | |
State | |
Zip Code | |
Country | |
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
| City | |
State | |
Zip Code | |
Country | |
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
| 1 |
|
3 |
|
||||||
| 2 |
|
4 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
| Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
| Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% | |||||||||||||
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
| 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 |