|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
Address1 | 25 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700 |
Address2 |
|
City | Washington |
State | DC |
Zip Code | 20001 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
|
5. Senate ID# 311451-12
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 400020000
|
TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2017 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date |
|
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
Signature | Digitally Signed By: Richard Trachtman |
Date | 7/19/2017 12:01:04 PM |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code HCR
16. Specific lobbying issues
Preserving Access to Primary Care Services: Address the shortage of primary care physicians; provide scholarships and loan forgiveness in exchange for primary care service commitments to practice in critical shortage areas; provide grants for medical school mentorship programs and primary care training in community health centers; increase Title VII funding for primary care health programs; increase funding for the National Health Service Corps, provide regulatory relief for primary care physicians; H.R. 7192/S. 1174, the Preserving Patient Access to Primary Care Act (as first introduced in the 111th Congress).
Support the Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148, P.L. 111-152) by: Expanding coverage and improving Medicare benefits; Providing needed protections to guard against insurance practices that unfairly limit, deny or rescind coverage based on health status; public and private health insurers should encourage preventive health care by providing full coverage, with no cost-sharing, for preventive services recommended by an expert advisory group, such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; Ensuring access to primary care physicians; and beginning to bend the cost curve; Prohibiting insurers from excluding or charging excessive rates to children based on pre-existing conditions, which later will be expanded to all persons; Covering young adults on their parents' plans; Eliminating lifetime and annual limits on health insurance coverage; Requiring that health insurers spend more on patient care and less on administration; support enactment of S. 248, the Empowering States to Innovate Act, which amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) to: (1) allow states to apply for waivers of certain health insurance coverage requirements in such Act (including requirements for the establishment of qualified health plans and health insurance exchanges) for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014 (currently, January 1, 2017), and (2) require the waiver application process to begin not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act; Phasing out the Medicare Part D doughnut hole; Eliminating patient cost-sharing for preventive services offered by Medicare or private insurers; Increasing Medicare and Medicaid payments to primary care physicians; Supporting the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to help physicians and patients make care decisions based on the best available evidence; Supporting the Center on Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to fund pilots of delivery models to improve outcomes and reduce costs, including patient-centered medical homes; Training more primary care physicians through the National Health Service Corps, Title VII health professions funding, and redistributing unused graduate medical education positions to primary care specialties facing shortages; Beginning in 2014, ensuring that nearly all Americans have access to coverage either through subsidized private health insurance offered by state health exchanges or through Medicaid, if they don't already have access to coverage through an employer, Medicare, or another public program; voiced strong opposition to the American Health Care Act/Better Care Reconciliation Act because this legislation would cap the federal contribution to Medicaid or block grant the program, end support for Medicaid expansion, allow state waivers to eliminate essential evidence-based benefits, cut funding for opioid use treatment, restrict access to womens health services, and replace the Affordable Care Acts income-based premium and cost-saving subsidies with regressive age-based ones that will raise premiums and deductibles for most Americans, especially, for older, poorer and sicker patients.
Medicare Physician Payment Reform: Advocated in support of H.R. 2, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which was enacted in April 2015 and repealed Medicares Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula and moved us to a new value-based payment and delivery system under Medicare; Advocated with CMS on numerous aspects of the MACRA proposed and final rules, including: proposing a distinctive alternative scoring methodology, developed by ACP, which combines, simplifies, aligns and reduces the complexity of the four reporting categories that will qualify physicians for FFS payment adjustments in 2019; proposing specific alternatives to CMS Advancing Care Information program that is to replace the current Meaningful Use program; proposing additional improvements to simplify the reporting requirements for the Quality, Advancing Care Information and Clinical Practice Improvement categories; urging CMS to immediately create virtual reporting options and to create safe harbors for smaller practices until such options are available; proposing more options and flexibility, instead of a one-size fits all approach, for practices to be certified as Patient-Centered Medical Homes or Patient-Centered Medical Home specialty practices, qualifying them for the highest possible score for the Clinical Practice Improvement Activity reporting category; Proposing four different options for Medical Home practices to qualify as advanced Alternative Payment Models, instead of the single option proposed by CMS, including options to allow PCMHs to qualify without taking financial risk: Advocated with CMS on Patient Relationship Categories and Codes, as required by MACRA, specifically: that CMS work to ensure that patients, families, and the relationship of patients and families with their physicians are at the forefront of the Agencys thinking in the development of both the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) pathways; that the implementation of these categories and codes is carried out in a manner that fully considers and minimizes the impact of reporting burden on the participating clinicians and that has appropriate flexibility to allow for learning and improvement in the approach by both the Agency and the clinicians; that CMS use its authority to adjust resource use down from 10 percent in the first performance period by setting resource use at zero and increasing the quality performance category by 10 percent to make up for the difference; that CMS ensures the utmost transparency in how the Agency attributes cost, based on the use of the patient relationship categories and codes, along with the codes for care episodes and patient conditions; that CMS allow all Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to be eligible to participate in Track 1+ and to not restrict participation based on ACO size or composition (ex. only physician-led ACOs or small ACOs); that CMS allow current ACOs to move into Track 1+ at the start of any performance year and not be required to wait until the beginning of their next three-year agreement period; that Track 1+ utilize the same benchmarking methodology used for the other MSSP tracks; that CMS implement a minimum threshold of 5,000 beneficiaries for Track 1+, which is consistent with the other MSSP tracks but is lower than the 10,000 (or 7,500 for rural ACOs) beneficiary threshold used in the Next Generation ACO model.
Medical Education: Provide incentives to medical schools, community health centers, or hospitals, to increase the numbers of physicians choosing primary care; authorize HHS to selectively eliminate Graduate Medical Education (GME) caps for residency programs in primary care, advocated for S. 1627, which would increase the number of Medicare-supported training positions for medical residents by 15 percent (approximately 15,000 slots) over five years, requiring at least 50 percent of the new positions to be allocated to specialties facing a current shortage; Advocated to protect Medicare beneficiary access to health care services by preserving existing Medicare financing for Graduate Medical Education (GME). In the 114th Congress, advocated for S.1148/H.R.2124 and H.R. 1117-to strategically increase the number of GME training positions in primary care specialties (including internal medicine) and other specialties facing shortages. Urged lawmakers to combine DGME and IME into a single, more functional payment program, and broaden the GME financing structure to include all payers; Allocate GME funds transparently and specifically to activities that further the educational mission of teaching and training residents and fellows with input from practicing clinicians and in collaboration with their professional organizations.
FY2018 Appropriations: Supported funding to "improve health care quality, enhance consumer choice, advance patient safety, improve efficiency, reduce medical errors, and broaden access to essential services; Advocated for funding for AHRQ and Patient Centered Outcome Research Trust Fund, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA); Title VII, Section 747, Primary Care Training and Enhancement; National Health Service Corps.
Public Health Programs and Funding: Increase funding to accomplish the core missions and activities of the major federal public health agencies, including: biomedical and behavioral research, disease prevention and health promotion, access to safety net health care services, health professions education, mental health and substance abuse, health services research, health care for American Indians and Alaska natives, food and drug safety.
Improving Access to Primary Care in the Context of Comprehensive Healthcare Reform Legislation (H.R. 3962/H.R. 3590/H.R. 4872):
Ensure that all Americans will have access to affordable coverage.
Provide sliding scale subsidies based on income to buy coverage from qualified plans; Qualified plans should: provide evidence-based benefits, including preventive services; and be prohibited from excluding persons with pre-existing conditions, charging them more, cherry-picking enrollees, or cancelling or failing to renew coverage; Expand Medicaid to cover all persons below the Federal Poverty Level and ensure fair payments to participating physicians; As coverage becomes affordable, all persons should participate and coverage should be guaranteed; Responsibility for financing should be shared by individuals, employers and government. Regarding the Essential Health Benefits Bulletin, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on December 16, 2011, the College advocated for striking a balance between comprehensiveness and affordability while giving States some freedom to determine a package that best serve the needs of residents. The College believes that strong oversight is needed when determining the initial benchmark plan (and whether it reflects the coverage requirements of the Affordable Care Act) and how the package will be updated, particularly if insurers are given the ability to substitute benefits within and across categories. State and the federal government must work in concert with physicians, health care providers and payers to determine and promote use of clinically effective and cost-effective services that result in improved patient health while bending the cost curve. Advocated to repeal the mandate that requires a prescription for over-the-counter medications purchased through a Health Savings Account. Advocated for legislation that would provide coverage under Medicare for voluntary consultations between doctors and patients to discuss advance care plans, as included in H.R. 1173, the Personalize Your Care Act of 2013; advocated in Aug. 2014 for the Medicare Advantage Participants Bill of Rights, H.R. 4998 and S. 2552, that would prevent Medicare Advantage plans from terminating physicians from Medicare Advantage plan networks without sufficient notice or cause. Under the Affordable Care Act, advocated to ensure that people residing in states with health insurance marketplaces operated by the federal government do not lose their premium subsidies in the event that the Supreme Court rules in favor of the petitioners in the King versus Burwell case. Congress should not make changes in the ACA that would result in more uninsured persons or weaken consumer protections.
Pilot test Medicare payment models that re-align incentives to support effective, efficient, patient-centered, coordinated care. Priority should be given to models designed to support the value of services provided by primary care physicians as well as to models that would create incentives, across physician specialties and sites of services, to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of care provided. Policy criteria for selecting the most promising models for pilot testing should be developed, in consultation with outside experts; The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), which has shown great promise in meeting the policy objectives suggested above, should be among the models selected for broader testing on a national pilot basis; the establishing of a new CMS Innovation Center to pilot-test new payment models, such as the medical home; the use of the medical home model for treatment or services under private health plans, the requirement of health plans to provide incentives to promote and report on medical home services provided, the establishment of community health teams and a primary care extension program to educate and support primary care practices in the delivery of medical home services, and the establishment of a demonstration project to educate physicians and other clinicians in training in the competencies required to deliver care consistent with the medical home care model.
National workforce policy to ensure sufficient numbers of primary care and other physicians: Increase funding for scholarships and loan repayment programs under Title VII as well as increase funding for the National Health Service Corps (NHSC); Provide new practice-entry bonus for scholarship or loan repayment award recipients who remain in underserved communities after completion of service obligation.
Reducing Administrative Burdens on Physicians: Urged Congress to reduce administrative tasks that negatively impact physicians and patients, including: 1)Encourage the administration to convene a multi-agency task force to identify tasks that could be streamlined or eliminated, based on a new comprehensive framework to assess the intent and impact of administrative tasks on care as proposed in ACPs policy paper, Putting Patients First by Reducing Administrative Tasks in Health Care, 2) Establish a process to require that CMS and other relevant federal agencies reexamine and replace the existing E/M documentation guidelines with input from practicing clinicians and their professional organizations, 3) Call on federal advisory bodies, such as the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), to research the effect of administrative tasks on patient and family care experience and outcomes, 4) Facilitate congressional hearings among government, clinician stakeholders, EHR vendors and suppliers to foster collaboration between parties to recognize their role and responsibility in reducing health IT administrative burdens.
Opioid Abuse: ACP supports efforts in trying to improve access to care and treatment for those suffering from mental health and substance abuse disorders. As contained in S. 2256, Co-Prescribing Saves Lives Act of 2015, ACP supports a comprehensive national policy on prescription drug abuse containing education, monitoring, proper disposal, and enforcement elements. As contained in S. 2256, Co-Prescribing Saves Lives Act of 2015, ACP is supportive of expanding access to naloxone within the community. ACP also supports the policy proposal known as partial-fill. This would allow a patient to elect to receive a portion of a prescription, and return for either a portion of, or the remainder of the prescription, if the pain persists, up to a 30-day maximum. Urged lawmakers to include language in the final House opioids legislative package to ensure healthcare providers who are engaged in population health initiatives have access to the medical records they need, including information on substance use disorders, to effectively and safely treat their patients; Urged lawmakers to reach agreement on a final conference report to the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) that would include: Development of a federal interagency task force to review, modify, and update, as appropriate, best practices for pain management and prescribing pain medication; Grants to states to expand awareness and education of physicians, patients, health care providers regarding the risks associated with the misuse of opioids; A comprehensive Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) to track the dispensing of controlled substances; Increased availability of opioid overdose reversal drugs; Alternatives to incarceration to individuals who misuse opioid drugs and other substances to manage their pain.
Zika: ACP urged lawmakers to pass legislation that would provide the highest possible funding level for research, prevention, control, and treatment of illnesses associated with the Zika virus that is commensurate with the public health emergency that the virus represents.
Prescription Drugs: ACP advocated support for lawmakers efforts in preventing some brand-name drug-companies from using statutorily required Food and Drug Administration (FDA) risk and safety programs to stifle other companies development of generic and biosimilar versions of brand-name drugs, specifically through introduction of the CREATES Act. Urged lawmakers to increase transparency in drug pricing by requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to publically disclose production costs including research and development investments for specific high‐cost drugs that the Secretary identifies through regulation; Authorize and appropriate $2.74 billion in discretionary spending for the FDA to expedite, through fast-track approval, new drugs that address unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or life threatening condition, as well as to address the back-log of pending generic drug applications; Grant authority to the Secretary of HHS to negotiate prescription drug prices with manufacturers for prescription drugs covered under Part D of the Medicare program. Expressed support for S. 41, the Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act that will empower the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers the prices (including discounts, rebates, and other price concessions) that may be charged for prescription drugs covered under Medicare Part D in prescription drug plans that participate in this program; Supported provisions in the FDA Reauthorization Act that provide goal dates for all outstanding generic applications; establishment of priority review timelines for generic drugs; and efforts to continue building the biosimilars review program.
Medical Liability Reform: Expressed support for H.R. 1215, the Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017, which would set a federal limit on the amount of non-economic damages to $250,000 and would enact a fair share rule that specifies that in any health care lawsuit, each party shall be liable for that partys share of damages only and not for the share of any other person. It would specify that any state law that imposes different standards on non-economic damages or separate limits on a partys share of damages would supersede any new caps imposed by this legislation regardless of whether the amount imposed by the states is greater or less than those imposed by H.R. 1215; Supported legislation that allows physicians who document adherence to certain evidence-based clinical-practice guidelines and, when applicable, appropriate use criteria, a safe harbor from medical malpractice litigation, as proposed by the Saving Lives, Saving Cost Act, H.R. 1565.
Chronic Care Management: Urged lawmakers to eliminate the beneficiary co-pay for chronic care management (CCM) services, require reimbursement and coverage of additional codes for more complex CCM services, direct HHS to authorize payment for CCM codes to allow physicians to spend up to 40 minutes with a patient and an additional code that would allow for 60 minutes of treatment for a patient with multiple chronic illnesses.
Telemedicine: Urged lawmakers to broadly lift geographic restrictions on telemedicine, facilitate the use of such telehealth services in stroke treatment, and incorporate the use of these services into ACOs, cosponsor bipartisan legislation, Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) For Health Act (the CONNECT For Health Act), H.R. 4442/S. 2484, which would expand the use of telemedicine and remote patient monitoring (RPM) services by physicians to improve care of patients enrolled in Medicare.
Mental Health: Urged lawmakers to establish grants, including Innovation and Demonstration grants, to State and local governments, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations for integrating or coordinating physical health, mental health and substance abuse services; Provide a defined portion of grant funding to the effective integration of services to address mental illness and substance abuse within the primary care setting and to expand a workforce trained to integrate behavioral health within the primary care setting.
21st Century Cures Act: Advocated with Congress on several elements of the 21st Century Cures Act, comprehensive legislation designed to accelerate the discovery, development, and delivery of new cures and treatments. These elements included: support for moving the health information technology (health IT) ecosystem toward an interoperable health information network, combatting business practices that inhibit the flow of information by establishing authority for the HHS Office of Inspector General to investigate claims of information blocking and assign penalties for activities found to be interfering with the lawful sharing of electronic information, ensuring that health care clinicians are not penalized for the failure of developers of health IT in the case of information blocking, the establishment of hardship exemptions from Meaningful Use and the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) payment adjustments due to the decertification of an electronic health record (EHR) and, a commitment to develop a strategy around reducing regulatory and administrative burdens, improving and increasing access to treatment for patients suffering from mental health and substance use disorders and ensure better understanding and enforcement of mental health parity laws, accelerating the integration of behavioral health into the primary care setting.
Insurance Market Stabilization: Commented on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Proposed Rule: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Market Stabilization. Specifically, the Agency should not allow issuers to deny coverage enrollees with bad debt; instead, the issuer should be required to enroll the individual and allow the enrollee to pay the outstanding debt over a period of time; recommended that the open enrollment period for plan year 2018 begin on November 1, 2017 and end on January 31, 2018; States operating a state-based, state-based/federal platform, and partnership marketplaces should be permitted to establish longer open enrollment periods; Expressed concern about the proliferation of narrow provider networks, that tight provider networks coupled with inaccurate provider directories create a frustrating, confusing and expensive experience for patients seeking care from their preferred physicians.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS), President of the U.S.
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Richard |
Trachtman |
|
|
|
Jonni |
McCrann |
|
|
|
Brian |
Buckley |
|
|
|
Jared |
Frost |
|
|
|
Shuan |
Tomlinson |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
Address |
|
||||||
City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
1 |
|
3 |
|
||||||
2 |
|
4 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
1 | 2 | 3 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% |
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
1 | 3 | 5 |
2 | 4 | 6 |