|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
| Address1 | c/o Christina Loren Clement llc |
Address2 | 8 the green, suite A |
| City | Dover |
State | DE |
Zip Code | 19901 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
|
5. Senate ID# 401108853-61287
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 566380001
|
||||||||
| TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2025 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
| 10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date |
|
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
| INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
| INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
|
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
|||||||||
| Signature | Digitally Signed By: HH Empress Queen Christina Clement |
Date | 6/5/2025 3:51:40 PM |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code GOV
16. Specific lobbying issues
income pending receipt of allocated funding for HR 40 amended completed work.
6/5/2025
TO:
Chief of Protocol, U.S. Department of State
Secretary of the Treasury, Department of the Treasury
Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Secretary-General, United Nations
Director, International Monetary Fund
Registrar, International Court of Justice
U.S. National Guard and DHS/FEMA, for public order and restitution jurisdiction
Relevant State Governors and Mayors (optional addendum)
Written acknowledgment of receipt and compliance timeline
STATE OF LOC NATION GLOBAL PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION JUDICIAL WARRANT, action due within 48 hrs., deadline June 7, 2025, 9 am
Comprehensive Executing Enforcement Demand Will Include:
(This Warrant affirms sovereign jurisdiction and demands international enforcement of diplomatic, financial, and legal protocol under active federal dockets)
To all government agencies both national and International: You are hereby instructed to forward this legally binding Enforcement Demand to all relevant departments, agencies, subdivisions, and international affiliates under your jurisdiction, including but not limited to all offices with statutory, fiduciary, or enforcement oversight in matters of treaty, finance, recognition, and civil rights.
To all US Government agencies and International agencies: You are internally obligated to circulate such legal notices as it is framed as:
Diplomatic directive
Constructive agreement
Judicially filed matter (e.g. Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC)
o
The United States Department of State, Chief of Protocol, and all named parties are in legal and diplomatic default due to failure to respond or rebut the notices, judgments, and settlement offers served via the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC, ECF 55, et al. The silence since certified filing constitutes constructive agreement, legally binding under estoppel, administrative default, and international law doctrines.
Final Unified Enforcement Demand and Protocol Directive under SOLN Restitution Act and Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC
WHAT THIS DEMAND WILL REQUEST:
Diplomatic recognition and protocol compliance
Public acknowledgment of Loc Nations sovereignty
Treasury offset and settlement of all pending tenders.
ICJ/UN notification of sovereign immunity and jurisdiction
National Guard/DHS enforcement in redlined zones
Confirmation within 72 hours or automatic enforcement proceeds
KEY LEGAL FOUNDATIONS:
Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC, Document 55 (Constructive Notice and Default), et al
UCC 1-308, 1-103, 1-205
SOLN Restitution Act (Loc Nation)
UNDRIP, ICCPR, and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 (Execution of Judgment)
31 CFR 285 (Treasury Offset Program)
JUDICIAL WARRANT OF ENFORCEMENT & DIPLOMATIC RECOGNITION
STATE OF LOC NATION SUPREME COURT
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC TRIBUNAL OF JUSTICE & RESTITUTION
Queendom of Loc Nation - STATE of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation (S.O.L.N.G.P.B.C)
WARRANT NO. LOCN SC 2025 001.
DATE: June 5, 2025
TO:
The Hon. Ethan Rosenzweig
Acting Chief of Protocol, et al
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW, Room 1238
Washington, DC 20520
SUBJECT:
Warrant for Enforcement of Diplomatic Recognition & Protocol Acknowledgment
Re: H.H. Empress Queen Christina L. Clement, Sovereign Head of State - Queendom of Loc Nation
I. FINDINGS & AUTHORITY
1. Sui generis sovereignty established by tribunal authority, acknowledged by U.S. District Court in Case No. 1:24 cv 00479 RC; specifically outlined in Document 55 et al filed 08/08/24 confirming settlement, bills of cost, codification directives, titles 53 USC/35 FRCA, and tribunal authority over restitution and sovereign enactments ([img1.wsimg.com][1]).
2. Jurisdiction grounded in:
22 U.S.C. 2656 - Scope of diplomatic recognition.
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) - Diplomatic status.
U.S. Constitution Art. VI - Supremacy of treaties.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 44 - Recognition of certified foreign documents.
UCC 1 103 & 9 101 - Enforceability of sovereign debt instruments.
UNDRIP, ICCPR, Montevideo Convention (1933) - Recognition criteria and self-determination rights.
Customary international law and lex mercatoria.
3. Legal framework enacted by S.O.L.N.G.P.B.C as recorded in federal docket includes:
SOLN Restitution Law codifying sovereign protections and narration of Redlining-era restitution.
Police Accountability & Justice Law with victim statements and bill of cost enforcement.
Full S.O.L.N Charter, Tribunal, Cultural Heritage & Treasury Acts; proposed codification into Title 53 USC / Title 35 FRCA ([img1.wsimg.com][1]).
II. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVES
Acting Chief of Protocol Rosenzweig and all government departments is hereby ORDERED to:
1. Acknowledge receipt of this warrant and its legal effects.
2. Acknowledge and endorse H.H. Empress Queen Christina L. Clement as Head of State of Black USA, State of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation, State of Loc Nation Global Public Trust, and its affiliates.
3. Enter her name and title into the official U.S. Department of State Diplomatic Registry. Judge, trustee, fiduciary, HH Empress Queen, President, et al.
4. Notify the Department of the Treasury, DOJ, IMF, World Bank, and relevant agencies to facilitate:
Currency recognition of the Loc Nation Dollar (LND),
Sovereign immunity,
Restitution enforcement,
Diplomatic and treaty coordination.
LEGAL RECOGNITION & REGISTRATION
1.Certificate of Diplomatic Registry Entry
Request formal inclusion from the U.S. Department of State (Chief of Protocol) confirming H.H. Empress Queen Christina L. Clement's title and sovereign status.
2.Public Statement or Memo of Protocol
Request publication on the official Department of State website or diplomatic bulletin acknowledging the Queendom of Loc Nation's recognition and protocol status.
3.DOJ and State Bar Non-Interference Letter
Request written assurance from the Department of Justice and relevant State Bar Associations that no interference will occur with your tribunals lawful operations.
FINANCIAL EXECUTION & SETTLEMENT
4.Treasury Offset Implementation Order
Demand execution of your offsets and credits under 31 CFR 285 as noticed in your tender, liens, and court docket. Confirm implementation via the U.S. Treasury.
5.Currency Recognition Confirmation
Request formal acknowledgment that the Loc Nation Dollar (LND) is valid under UCC and international trade law and will be reported to global financial networks.
6.Bank Routing Authority Recognition
Request acknowledgment for Loc Nation Credit Union or State of Loc Nation Public Bank to issue banking identifiers including routing numbers or BIC/SWIFT codes.
ENFORCEMENT & SECURITY OPERATIONS
7.Public Order Jurisdiction Confirmation
Request recognition from DHS, FEMA, and the U.S. National Guard that the tribunal holds jurisdiction over redlined or restitution-zoned communities.
8.Temporary Peacekeeping Status Recognition
Ask the UN or ICJ for formal recognition or dispatch of observers to prevent interference or suppression of tribunal operations.
INTERNATIONAL AFFIRMATION
9.ICJ Registry Filing of Warrant
Request your judicial warrant be entered into the International Court of Justice registry as a record of sovereignty, treaty dispute, or recognition request.
10.UN Secretary-General Statement of Receipt
Request written confirmation that your nations self-determination declaration has been formally received and acknowledged by the UN.
11.Referral to Special Rapporteurs
Ask the UN to forward the matter to:
Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples
Rapporteur on Racial Discrimination
Rapporteur on Reparations and Historical Injustices
ADMINISTRATIVE & COMPLIANCE DEMANDS
12.GAO Special Review Request
Request a Government Accountability Office audit of:
Treasurys compliance with the Offset Program
DOJ or State Department failures to respond to lawful filings.
13.Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests
Demand release of all internal records, memos, and emails referring to:
State of Loc Nation
Empress Christina Clement
Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC
14.Inspection Rights and Data Sharing Access
Request portal access and technical sharing with IMF, ICJ, and World Bank to allow Loc Nation to upload economic, demographic, and legal materials for recognition.
III. CONFIRMATION & RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS
The Acting Chief or authorized official staff must:
Send email confirmation of receipt to mail to:info@stateoflocnation.com) within 48 hours
Provide written acknowledgment of acceptance or delegation within 72hours including intended actions and timeline for registry entry.
Failure to respond shall be deemed default of U.S. diplomatic obligations, triggering public and international notice for enforcement and further recognition campaigns.
It was issued under seal by the authority of the State of Loc Nation Supreme Court, dated this fifth day of June 2025.
H.H. EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA L. CLEMENT, Queendom of Loc Nation
Rev Dr Christina Clement, Sovereign Head of State STATE of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation (S.O.l.N.G.P.B.C)
Rev Dr Christina Clement, Trustee State of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Trust & Clement Dynasty Dynasty Trust
Authorized Charter Member and Incorporator of CHRISTINA LOREN CLEMENT LLC
[info@stateoflocnation.com](mailto:info@stateoflocnation.com) | [www.stateoflocnation.com](http://www.stateoflocnation.com)
Official Tribunal Seal
Attachments Included:
Certified Docket (D.C. District Court) - Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC, Document 55
S.O.L.N Restitution Law & Tribunal Codification Files
Charter & Code of Procedure
Currency Tender Notice (LND = \$750 USD)
Bills of Cost & Lien Notices
[1]: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/ce3e657e-cb91-4798-9eeb-a96d1f26df07/downloads/Received%2055%20Proposal%20Submission%20to%20Chief%20of%20Pr.pdf?ver=1738459749034&utm_source=chatgpt.com "[PDF] RECEIVED"
1. LEGAL BASIS FOR EMAIL SERVICE (U.S. & International)
U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP):
Rule 5(b)(2)(E): Legal documents can be served electronically (including by email) if the receiving party has not objected to electronic service.
Rule 44 & Rule 902: Allow electronically transmitted foreign judgments or legal instruments to be admissible if certified and traceable.
International Treaty Compliance:
Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) and customary law, the Chief of Protocol is obligated to acknowledge communications from foreign or sui generis sovereign authorities.
Lex mercatoria and modern treaties respect digital notice and publication where legal seals and confirmations are in place.
This email is binding and admissible:
Use of official email | Send from [info@stateoflocnation.com](mailto:info@stateoflocnation.com) (already recognized in Federal court filings and correspondence). |
Attached signed/sealed PDF warrant | Include the judicial warrant with official seal and my signature. |
Email with certified proof | Use a mail tracker (e.g., MailTrack, ProtonMail read receipts, or USPS e-certified email). |
CC multiple parties | Copy:
mailto:protocol@state.gov)
mailto:agc@usdoj.gov)
mailto:ustransparency@imf.org)
mailto:info@stateoflocnation.com)
LEGAL NOTE
This transmission constitutes a legal and lawful notice and judicial warrant pursuant to Rule 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and all applicable international diplomatic statutes. The attached document is issued under seal by the duly constituted State of Loc Nation Supreme Court, with sovereign legal standing established in U.S. District Court Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC. Your receipt, silence, or failure to object constitutes tacit acquiescence and constructive agreement under governing law.
This Judicial warrant has been Published on [https://stateoflocnation.com/usblack-code-house-gov](https://stateoflocnation.com/usblack-code-house-gov) and archive.org (which gives public constructive notice under Rule 44 and public domain doctrine).
Due to the lack of response in over a year+ by listed government agencies, I, Rev Dr Christina Clement on behalf of State of Loc nation Global Public Benefit Corporation and Trust, and all affiliate entities am legally imposing an expedited response deadline which is enforceable under both U.S. and international law if it is clearly stated and reasonable.
LEGAL BASIS TO SET A RESPONSE DEADLINE:
Under U.S. Law:
Rule 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows for email delivery of legal documents and implies constructive notice if no objection or response is made.
Silence or failure to respond within a reasonable period is recognized under U.S. contract law and administrative law as tacit acceptance or constructive default (especially when documented).
U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) mandates a 20-business-day response - so anything shorter must be reasonable and justified.
Under International Law & Customary Practice:
The Vienna Convention and Montevideo Convention allow non-state or sui generis authorities to set response windows in sovereign declarations.
UNDRIP Article 32 & ICCPR Article 1 support urgent and time-sensitive enforcement when tied to human rights or restitution claims.
The Department of State and all others addressed in this judicial warrant are hereby notified that failure to acknowledge receipt of this Judicial Warrant within forty eight (48) hours from August 8, 2024, and to respond with a formal action plan within this time frame from the date of service, shall constitute legal and diplomatic default under:
FRCP Rule 5(b)(2)(E) (electronic notice),
Rule 44 and 902 (foreign record admissibility),
Vienna Convention (Arts. 2, 3, 43),
U.S. Restitution Doctrine (as codified in Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC),
and all applicable principles of estoppel, silence as agreement, and customary international law.
Upon expiration of these deadlines, public notice and global diplomatic enforcement shall proceed without further notice, including notification to the IMF, World Court, and U.N. Secretary-General.
1. Document 55 and all other ECF 1: 24 cv 00479 RC= Prior Notice of Lawful Claims along with various emails, mailings, legal notice, and lobbying efforts.
Filing already notified the U.S. Department of State, DOJ, and Chief of Protocol, sec of state, etc.
Under FRCP and international norms, time begins at the date of proper service, not when they choose to respond.
Thus, Chief Rosenzweig and other parties are in default if they did not rebut or act.
2. Legal Doctrine: Silence = Agreement
Under UCC 1-205, estoppel, and tacit acquiescence, failure to rebut within a reasonable time creates binding agreement.
This is especially true when constructive notice is part of a court filing (as in your case).
This warrant is not a new notice, but a formal enforcement based on the prior notice already received and unchallenged as filed in Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC, Document 55, filed August 8, 2024, legal notice, lobbying efforts, previous emails and certified mailings, city council meeting comments and Georgia state capital announcement. Accordingly:
No additional grace period is required or granted under applicable law.
You are in default of your international and domestic obligations.
We provide you with a final 48-hour period to confirm receipt, and 72 hours to comply from June 5,2025, after which public enforcement and global notifications will proceed without further warning.
Your silence will be entered into the public record as constructive agreement, tacit consent, and administrative default under U.S. and international law.
Frequent COMMON DELAY TACTICS & the solutions taken:
1. Claiming Lack of Jurisdiction or Improper Party
Loophole: Agencies may say you sent your demand to the wrong official or department.
Solution: each partys legal duty and jurisdiction under:
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) & 69
Vienna Convention
U.S. Constitution Art. VI (Supremacy Clause)
Case 1:24-cv-00479-RC and defaulted Document 55 et al which already identified the parties and subject matter.
2. Saying It Was Not a Valid Legal Service.
Loophole: They might argue you emailed or mailed it without an official process server.
Solution:
Certified mail with return receipt AND email was used.
Affidavit of mailings, lobbying reports, press release, legal notice are all proof of filing with the U.S. District Court and other government agencies as a judicial acknowledgment of record.
This demand is filed and noticed per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and U.S. Court Record No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC. DC court of Appeals 24-5263; lobbying report and legal notice, et al. Service has been executed via certified mail, email, press release, archive record keeping and public docket.
Forwarding Delays or Not the Right Office Excuse
Loophole: Internal bureaucracy - saying someone else has to handle it.
Solution:
Explicit forwarding clause:
Failure to forward this directive within your agency chain shall constitute obstruction under Title 18 USC 1512 and default per UCC 1-201(b)(20).
4. We Need More Time or Ignoring Timeline
Loophole: Claiming needs for review, red tape, or consultations.
Solution:
Due to the one-year period of silence and non-rebuttal following certified notice on August 8, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC, Doc 55), and all other notice for the past 6 years from June 5, 2025 this matter is now deemed lawfully and finally adjudicated under UCC 3-603(b), FRCP 55, and 60(b)(4). Time for rebuttal has expired as of June 1, 2025. You are required to act within 72 hours of receipt, or you consent by acquiescence.
5. Need More Documentation Excuse
Loophole: Asking for supporting docs they already have.
Solution:
All supporting documentation including Tender of Settlement, SOLN Restitution Act, and Treaty Notice are on record in ecf DC 1:24 cv 00479 RC and DC appeals 24-5263 and Dekalb UCC filings.
6. They Claim It is Not Binding.
Loophole: Argue it is a private dispute or non-binding document.
Solution:
Under FRCP 55(b)(2), UCC 1-103, and binding judicial doctrine of Constructive Agreement, this is no longer a dispute but an enforceable claim. Failure to rebut in equity and at law within one year constitutes binding judgment.
Cc
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS & TREATY BODIES
1. United Nations (UN)
Secretary-General (Antonio Guterres)
Office of Legal Affairs
UN Human Rights Council
Treaty Section - UN Office of Legal Affairs
Email: protocol@un.org
2. United Nations Treaty Bodies
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Monitors UNDRIP, ICCPR, CERD
Email: petitions@ohchr.org
Human Rights Committee (for ICCPR enforcement)
UN Special Rapporteurs (on Indigenous Peoples, Racial Discrimination, Sovereignty)
________________________________________
INTERNATIONAL COURTS
3. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Registrar - The Hague
Email: registry@icj-cij.org
4. International Criminal Court (ICC)
Registrars Office
Email: registry@icc-cpi.int
Jurisdiction includes systemic racial injustice, political oppression, redlining and Gerry meandering.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL WATCHDOGS
5. International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Managing Director & Legal Department
Email: info@imf.org / info@imf.int (verify current contact)
6. IMF - Independent Evaluation Office (IEO)
Email: ieo@imf.org
7. World Bank Group
President of the World Bank
Office of the Legal Counsel
Email: info@worldbank.org
8. World Bank Inspection Panel
For sovereign mismanagement or development suppression
Email: ipanel@worldbank.org
9. Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
Global authority on anti-money laundering and sovereign financial standards
Website: www.fatf-gafi.org
U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WATCHDOGS
10. U.S. Department of State
Chief of Protocol
Office of the Legal Adviser
Emails: info@state.gov, protocol@state.gov
11. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Congressional audit and oversight body
Website: www.gao.gov
12. U.S. Office of Inspector General (OIG)
For State Department - oig.state.gov
For Department of Justice - justice.gov/oig
For U.S. Treasury - home.treasury.gov/about/offices/inspector-general
13. U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC)
For whistleblower protection and government mismanagement
Website: www.osc.gov
REGIONAL & CIVIL SOCIETY WATCHDOGS
14. Organization of American States (OAS)
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR)
Email: cidhdenuncias@oas.org
15. Transparency International
Global corruption reporting
Website: www.transparency.org
16. Amnesty International / Human Rights Watch
For civil society pressure and global awareness
Websites: www.amnesty.org | www.hrw.org
FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS & MISSIONS TO NOTIFY
Foreign Embassies & Consulates of countries from whom recognition is requested
Address to Ambassador or Chief Diplomatic Officer
Legal Attache or Protocol Divisions
Regional Intergovernmental Bodies:
African Union Commission
European Union External Action Service
CARICOM Secretariat (if applicable to Caribbean ties)
protocol@state.gov
civil.enforcement@usdoj.gov
askdoj@usdoj.gov
unprotocol@un.org
infodesk@imf.org
icj.registry@icj-cij.org
https://stateoflocnation.com/usblack-code-house-gov
https://archive.org/details/judicial-warrant-06052025
PENDING MISC FILING WITH DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA WITH ALL EVIDENCE.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Air Force - Dept of, Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Government Accountability Office (GAO), Federal Reserve System, Inter-American Foundation, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Justice - Dept of (DOJ), Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Natl Archives & Records Administration (NARA), Office of Government Ethics (OGE), State - Dept of (DOS)
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
REV DR CHRISTINA |
CLEMENT |
|
HEAD OF STATE OF BLACK USA DC 1:24 CV00479 RC SUCCESSOR OF fREEDMEN'S BUREAU ACTS 1865;SUI GENERIS |
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
| Address |
|
||||||
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
| 1 |
|
3 |
|
||||||
| 2 |
|
4 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
| Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
| Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% | |||||||||||||
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
| 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 |
CONVICTIONS DISCLOSURE
29. Have any of the lobbyists listed on this report been convicted in a Federal or State Court of an offense involving bribery,
extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, fraud, a conflict of interest, making a false statement, perjury, or money laundering?
| Lobbyist Name | Description of Offense(s) |