|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
| Address1 | 651 Commerce Drive |
Address2 |
|
| City | Roseville |
State | CA |
Zip Code | 95678 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
| City | Roseville |
State | CA |
Zip Code | 95678 |
Country | USA |
|
5. Senate ID# 400328546-12
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 403000000
|
||||||||
| TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2020 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
| 10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date |
|
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
| INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
| INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
|
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
|||||||||
| Signature | Digitally Signed By: Jack Lincoln |
Date | 4/20/2020 5:31:58 PM |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code TEC
16. Specific lobbying issues
A recent FCC Order overturned local control over pole attachments, preempting existing agreements, threatening community safety, forcing subsidization of broadband providers, and countermands congressional directive. NCPA urged support for H.R. 530, legislation that would vacate the FCC order and restore local control over pole attachments and broadband deployment.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Jane |
Cirrincione |
|
|
|
Jack |
Lincoln |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code NAT
16. Specific lobbying issues
In consideration of any new federal policy, NCPA encourages Congress to not abruptly curtail the use of recent clean energy investments like NCPA's Lodi Energy Center that were made in good faith to address Californias reliability needs and operational requirements to integrate intermittent renewable resources. Changes in federal energy policy that render the Lodi Energy Center inoperable or uneconomic would strand public bond investments.
NCPA and its members benefit from the federal hydropower resource generated by the Central Valley Project in California. As a result of decades-long policy changes currently underway, NCPA encourages the Bureau of Reclamation to implement changes that do not jeopardize the sustainable, low cost, and reliable nature of the resource.
Many of NPCAs member communities exist in or around wildfire-prone areas known as Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) zones. Given the changing environmental, regulatory, and business conditions that have led to an increase in destructive wildfires, NCPA encourages Congress to implement reforms that reduce the severity and frequency of wildfires and provide public power utilities with the tools and resources to decrease their risks associated with such incidents.
NCPA and a large portion of it's membership benefit from our hydroelectric project. Unfortunately, due to a series of extreme weather events and debris flows from USFS land, a massive amount of sediment buildup has occurred. This sediment buildup has degraded the water quality, accelerated the wear and tear of the turbines, and reduced overall power output to nine NCPA member communities served by the project. To ensure proper project operations, a solution is needed to remove the debris that has flowed into this reservoir from federal lands through landslides and erosion-however, the USFS has declined requests to relocate the sediment back onto the adjacent land it manages. That is why NCPA is encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to take action to allow for sediment relocation on federal lands.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Forest Service
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Jane |
Cirrincione |
Ms. |
|
|
Jack |
Lincoln |
|
|
|
Scott |
Tomashefsky |
|
|
|
Regina |
Reiger |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code ENG
16. Specific lobbying issues
Urged for action by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation that would provide a comprehensive solution that restores the competitiveness of power from the Central Valley Project (CVP) and the viability of the CVP system, assuring that the many public benefits this project provides to Californians continue to be realized.
Included in this request was: 1) that the Bureau's Cost Allocation Study should be revised to reflect the actual value of CVP Power, 2) that funds associated with overcharging power customers for CVPIA costs must be returned to customers.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Bureau of Reclamation
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
| First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Jane |
Cirrincione |
|
|
|
Regina |
Reiger |
|
|
|
Jack |
Lincoln |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
| Address |
|
||||||
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
| City |
|
State |
|
Zip Code |
|
Country |
|
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
| 1 |
|
3 |
|
||||||
| 2 |
|
4 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
| Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
| Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% | |||||||||||||
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
| 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 |
CONVICTIONS DISCLOSURE
29. Have any of the lobbyists listed on this report been convicted in a Federal or State Court of an offense involving bribery,
extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, fraud, a conflict of interest, making a false statement, perjury, or money laundering?
| Lobbyist Name | Description of Offense(s) |