|
LOBBYING REPORT |
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Section 5) - All Filers Are Required to Complete This Page
2. Address
Address1 | 512 10TH STREET NW |
Address2 | |
City | WASHINGTON |
State | DC |
Zip Code | 20004 |
Country | USA |
3. Principal place of business (if different than line 2)
City | |
State | |
Zip Code | |
Country | |
|
5. Senate ID# 28481-12
|
||||||||
|
6. House ID# 316440000
|
TYPE OF REPORT | 8. Year | 2010 |
Q1 (1/1 - 3/31) | Q2 (4/1 - 6/30) | Q3 (7/1 - 9/30) | Q4 (10/1 - 12/31) |
9. Check if this filing amends a previously filed version of this report
10. Check if this is a Termination Report | Termination Date | |
11. No Lobbying Issue Activity |
INCOME OR EXPENSES - YOU MUST complete either Line 12 or Line 13 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12. Lobbying | 13. Organizations | ||||||||
INCOME relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period was: | EXPENSE relating to lobbying activities for this reporting period were: | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
Provide a good faith estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of all lobbying related income for the client (including all payments to the registrant by any other entity for lobbying activities on behalf of the client). | 14. REPORTING Check box to indicate expense accounting method. See instructions for description of options. | ||||||||
Method A.
Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only
Method B. Reporting amounts under section 6033(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code Method C. Reporting amounts under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code |
Signature | Digitally Signed By: Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director |
Date | 04/19/2010 |
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code BUD
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts to House offices regarding draft legislation to codify limitations on funding of abortions and health plans that cover abortion with funds appropriated by Congress (not introduced).
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code FAM
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts with House and Senate in opposition to the "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA), a bill to invalidate virtually all state and federal laws and policies that in any way limit access to abortion, the reintroduction of which is anticipated sometime during the 111th Congress. (continued)
Contacts to House in support of Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (CIANA) (H.R. 634) and the Child Custody Protection Act (unnumbered).
Contacts in support of S. 85 and H.R. 614, and the Pence Amendment to H.R. 3293, all measures to exclude certain abortion providers from funding under Title X of the Public Health Service Act.
Contacts in support of H.R. 636, the Positive Alternatives Act, sponsored by Rep. Michele Bachmann.
Contacts generally supportive of certain titles of S. 270 and H.R. 605, Pregnant Women Support Act, while not taking a position on the overall omnibus legislation at this time. Contacts expressing objections to certain components of S. 21 and H.R. 463. Contacts critiquing numerous deficiencies in Ryan-DeLauro bill (H.R. 3312).
Contacts in support of H.R. 649, the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act; H.R. 213, the Adoption Tax Relief Guarantee Act; and H.R. 195, the Informed Choice Act (aid for ultrasound machines for certain centers).
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code FOR
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts to House expressing general concerns about abortion-related issues that may arise during anticipated reauthorization/rewrite of the Foreign Assistance Act. Contacts in opposition to Senate ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code HCR
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts in support of amendments to remove pro-abortion mandates and abortion subsidies from health care reform bills. (continued)
Opposed "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (H.R. 3590), as passed by the Senate on December 24, 2009. In the House, advocated multiple revisions to correct pro-abortion provisions, including addition of language similar to the Stupak-Pitts Amendment added by the House to H.R. 3962 on November 7, 2009), to correct provisions that would otherwise allow or require funding of abortion, subsidies for health plans that cover abortion, and/or pro-abortion administrative mandates, such as language found in H. Con. Res. 254. Also contacts in support of the addition of "Hyde-Weldon" provision from H.R. 3962 (Section 259) to H.R. 3590. Contacts to House and Senate offices to explain that revisions proposed on February 22, 2010, by President Obama, would correct none of the abortion-related problems and make some worse. Contacts to House members pointing out that that no executive order could correct the objectionable provisions created by statutory requirements in the bill. Opposed concurrence in the Senate-passed bill (approved 219-212, March 21, 2010; signed into law March 23, 2010).
Provided analysis of revisions needed to H.R. 4529, Roadmap for America's Future Act, to prevent pro-abortion effects.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code HCR
16. Specific lobbying issues
U.S. Senate
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing. (continued)
On potential merger of Senate H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, with H.B. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act contacts in support of addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing. Contacts in support of the Senates anti-discrimination language as it related to Comparative Effectiveness Research. Contacts in support of extending the Senates comparative effectiveness anti-discrimination language to other places in the legislation where the Secretary is given authority to determine quality and efficiency. Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of either the House or Senate Advance Care planning provisions which contains disincentive for balanced counseling and incentives to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including life-preserving treatment, lacks representatives of disability rights groups and groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life, and lacks continuing oversight. Contacts to oppose further changes relating to advance care planning which would make changes to Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997. Contacts in support of conscience protection that does not extend to protecting providers against denial of medical care to an individual because of the individuals age, disability, or other characteristic. Contacts to ensure that taxpayer funds do not support of fund physician assisted suicide. Contacts in opposition to the Senate Independent Medicare Advisory Boards power to recommend, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to impose, requirements for insurance plans in the exchanges that would have the effect of limiting Americans right to spend their own money, if they choose, to save their own lives. Contacts in opposition to the Senate bills Independent Payment Advisory Board authority to make cuts in Medicare. Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care.
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal which would have imposed premium price controls on private plan and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care.
U.S. House of Representatives
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.
On potential merger of Senate H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, with H.B. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act contacts in support of addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing. Contacts in support of the Senates anti-discrimination language as it related to Comparative Effectiveness Research. Contacts in support of extending the Senates comparative effectiveness anti-discrimination language to other places of the mark where the Secretary is given authority to determine quality and efficiency. Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of either the House or Senate Advance Care planning provisions which contains disincentive for balanced counseling and incentives to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including life-preserving treatment, lacks representatives of disability rights groups and groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life, and lacks continuing oversight. Contacts to oppose further changes relating to advance care planning which would make changes to Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997. Contacts in support of conscience protection that does not extend to protecting providers against denial of medical care to an individual because of the individuals age, disability, or other characteristic. Contacts to ensure that taxpayer funds do not support of fund physician assisted suicide. Contacts in opposition to the Senate Independent Medicare Advisory Boards power to recommend, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to impose, requirements for insurance plans in the exchanges that would have the effect of limiting Americans right to spend their own money, if they choose, to save their own lives. Contacts in opposition to the Senate bills Independent Payment Advisory Board authority to make cuts in Medicare. Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. (continued)
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal which would have imposed premium price controls on private plan and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care.
Contacts expressing general concerns about denial of treatment and rationing provisions in H.R. 4529, the "Roadmap for America's Future Act" including: 1. The possibility of the health care services commissions dictation of the practice of medicine, 2. The inadequate protection of the use of discriminatory criteria in comparative effectiveness research, 3. The inconsistency in rejection of premium price controls, and 4. clarification that malpractice reform limitations ought not to apply to intentional discriminatory denial of life-preserving treatment.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE,
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Thomas (Burke) |
Balch |
|
|
|
Jennifer |
Popik |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code INS
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts in support of amendments to remove pro-abortion mandates and abortion subsidies from health care reform bills. (continued)
Opposed "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (H.R. 3590), as passed by the Senate on December 24, 2009. In the House, advocated multiple revisions to correct pro-abortion provisions, including addition of language similar to the Stupak-Pitts Amendment added by the House to H.R. 3962 on November 7, 2009), to correct provisions that would otherwise allow or require funding of abortion, subsidies for health plans that cover abortion, and/or pro-abortion administrative mandates, such as language found in H. Con. Res. 254. Also contacts in support of the addition of "Hyde-Weldon" provision from H.R. 3962 (Section 259) to H.R. 3590. Contacts to House and Senate offices to explain that revisions proposed on February 22, 2010, by President Obama, would correct none of the abortion-related problems and make some worse. Contacts to House members pointing out that that no executive order could correct the objectionable provisions of the bill. Opposed concurrence in the Senate-passed bill (approved 219-212, March 21, 2010); signed into law March 23, 2010.
Provided analysis of revisions needed to H.R. 4529, Roadmap for America's Future Act, to prevent pro-abortion effects. (continued)
U.S. Senate
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.
Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care.
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal which would have imposed premium price controls on private plan and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care.
U.S. House of Representatives
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.
Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care.
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal which would have imposed premium price controls on private plan and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care.
Contacts expressing general concerns about denial of treatment and rationing provisions in H.R. 4529, the "Roadmap for America's Future Act" including the inconsistency in rejection of premium price controls and the clarification that malpractice reform limitations ought not to apply to intentional discriminatory denial of life-preserving treatment.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
|
Thomas (Burke) |
Balch |
|
|
|
Jennifer |
Popik |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code MMM
16. Specific lobbying issues
U.S. Senate
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care; supported the addition of a variable financing method to avoid rationing. (continued)
On potential merger of Senate H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, with H.B. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act contacts in support of addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing. Contacts in support of the Senates anti-discrimination language as it related to Comparative Effectiveness Research. Contacts in support of extending the Senates comparative effectiveness anti-discrimination language to other places in the legislation where the Secretary is given authority to determine quality and efficiency. Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of either the House or Senate Advance Care planning provisions which contains disincentive for balanced counseling and incentives to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including life-preserving treatment, lacks representatives of disability rights groups and groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life, and lacks continuing oversight. Contacts to oppose further changes relating to advance care planning which would make changes to Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997. Contacts in support of conscience protection that does not extend to protecting providers against denial of medical care to an individual because of the individuals age, disability, or other characteristic. Contacts to ensure that taxpayer funds do not support of fund physician assisted suicide. Contacts in opposition to the Senate Independent Medicare Advisory Boards power to recommend, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to impose, requirements for insurance plans in the exchanges that would have the effect of limiting Americans right to spend their own money, if they choose, to save their own lives. Contacts in opposition to the Senate bills Independent Payment Advisory Board authority to make cuts in Medicare. Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care).
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal which would have imposed premium price controls on private plan and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care. (continued)
U.S. House of Representatives
Contacts in effort to oppose measures that could enable the rationing of health care; supported the addition of a variable financing method to avoid rationing.
On potential merger of Senate H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, with H.B. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act contacts in support of addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing. Contacts in support of the Senates anti-discrimination language as it related to Comparative Effectiveness Research. Contacts in support of extending the Senates comparative effectiveness anti-discrimination language to other places in the legislation where the Secretary is given authority to determine quality and efficiency. Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of either the House or Senate Advance Care planning provisions which contains disincentive for balanced counseling and incentives to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including life-preserving treatment, lacks representatives of disability rights groups and groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life, and lacks continuing oversight. Contacts to oppose further changes relating to advance care planning which would make changes to Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997. Contacts in support of conscience protection that does not extend to protecting providers against denial of medical care to an individual because of the individuals age, disability, or other characteristic. Contacts to ensure that taxpayer funds do not support of fund physician assisted suicide. Contacts in opposition to the Senate Independent Medicare Advisory Boards power to recommend, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to impose, requirements for insurance plans in the exchanges that would have the effect of limiting Americans right to spend their own money, if they choose, to save their own lives. Contacts in opposition to the Senate bills Independent Payment Advisory Board authority to make cuts in Medicare. Contacts in opposition to the Senate provisions wherein Commissioners of the State Health Insurance Exchanges are given discretion to impose price controls on insurance premiums under Section 1003 thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care. Contacts in opposition to H.B. 3962s section 3209s grant of discretion to CMS to deny older Americans the choice of plans whose premiums CMS deems too high thus limiting access to plans able to provide unrationed care).
Contacts in opposition to the inclusion of concepts from the February 22, 2010 Obama Administration health care proposal, which would have imposed premium price controls on private plans and denied senior citizens their current right to add their own money on top of the government Medicare contribution to get health insurance less likely to deny treatment through tightly controlled managed care.
Contacts expressing general concerns about denial of treatment and rationing provisions in H.R. 4529, the "Roadmap for America's Future Act" including: 1. The possibility of the health care services commissions dictation of the practice of medicine, 2. The inadequate protection of the use of discriminatory criteria in comparative effectiveness research, 3. The inconsistency in rejection of premium price controls, and 4. clarification that malpractice reform limitations ought not to apply to intentional discriminatory denial of life-preserving treatment.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE,
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Thomas (Burke) |
Balch |
|
|
|
Jennifer |
Popik |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code GOV
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts in opposition to confirmation of Dawn Johnsen as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel. (Nominee withdrew, April 9, 2010).
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code IND
16. Specific lobbying issues
In comprehensive reauthorization of Indian health programs, incorporated into H.R. 3590, advocated incorporation of language to prohibit subsidies for abortion.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
LOBBYING ACTIVITY. Select as many codes as necessary to reflect the general issue areas in which the registrant engaged in lobbying on behalf of the client during the reporting period. Using a separate page for each code, provide information as requested. Add additional page(s) as needed.
15. General issue area code SCI
16. Specific lobbying issues
Contacts to oppose S. 487 and H.R. 872, bills to foster federal funding of research that requires the killing of human embryos, and H.R. 4808, a bill to encourage federal funding of research that requires the killing of human embryos, including the creation of human embryos by cloning for the specific purpose of using them in research that will kill them ("clone and kill"). Contacts in support of H.R. 1050, the Stupak-Wamp Human Cloning Prohibition Act, and H.R. 877, the Forbes-Lipinski Patients First Act.
17. House(s) of Congress and Federal agencies Check if None
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE
18. Name of each individual who acted as a lobbyist in this issue area
First Name | Last Name | Suffix | Covered Official Position (if applicable) | New |
Douglas |
Johnson |
|
|
|
Susan |
Muskett |
|
|
|
Megan |
McCrum |
|
|
19. Interest of each foreign entity in the specific issues listed on line 16 above Check if None
Information Update Page - Complete ONLY where registration information has changed.
20. Client new address
Address | |
||||||
City | |
State | |
Zip Code | |
Country | |
21. Client new principal place of business (if different than line 20)
City | |
State | |
Zip Code | |
Country | |
22. New General description of client’s business or activities
LOBBYIST UPDATE
23. Name of each previously reported individual who is no longer expected to act as a lobbyist for the client
|
|
||||||||
1 |
|
5 |
|
||||||
2 |
|
6 |
|
||||||
3 |
|
7 |
|
||||||
4 |
|
8 |
|
ISSUE UPDATE
24. General lobbying issue that no longer pertains
DOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
25. Add the following affiliated organization(s)
Internet Address:
Name | Address |
Principal Place of Business (city and state or country) |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
26. Name of each previously reported organization that is no longer affiliated with the registrant or client
1 | 3 | 5 |
2 | 4 | 6 |
FOREIGN ENTITIES
27. Add the following foreign entities:
Name | Address |
Principal place of business (city and state or country) |
Amount of contribution for lobbying activities | Ownership percentage in client | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
% |
28. Name of each previously reported foreign entity that no longer owns, or controls, or is affiliated with the registrant, client or affiliated organization
1 | 5 | 9 |
2 | 6 | 10 |
3 | 7 | 11 |
4 | 8 | 12 |